Binghamton University Research News
  • News
  • Features
  • Faculty
  • Students
  • Videos
  • Photos
  • Subscribe

The economics of crime: Analysis suggests concealed handguns deter criminals, BU prof says

By Ingrid Husisian • Dec 7, 2001 • News•   

When the number of people carrying concealed handguns increases, crime decreases.

That’s the socially controversial finding of Binghamton University economist Florenz Plassmann and his collaborator, who used the principles of supply and demand to analyze crime rates.

Plassmann’s premise was detailed in an article in the October 2001 issue of Journal of Law and Economics. The article, “Does the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns Deter Countable Crime? Only a Count Analysis Can Say,” was written by Plassmann and T. Nicolaus Tideman, who was Plassmann’s dissertation adviser at Virginia Tech.

Plassmann’s assertion isn’t the first of its ilk, but it is something of a surprise to him, he admits.  In a 1997 book More Guns, Less Crime, economist John Lott similarly analyzed the relationship between the right to carry concealed handguns and the crime rate. Lott was the first to use economic principles to suggest that concealed weapons have a clear deterrent effect. If more people carry concealed handguns, crime decreases, his study showed.

Plassmann, an assistant professor of economics, says he was certain that a re-examination of Lott’s work would find Lott’s methodology questionable and his conclusions mistaken, he said.

“I believed guns would increase crime,” he said. “I had just finished a dissertation analyzing data similar to Lott’s. His data are ‘count data’ (non-negative integers), which means that you cannot have a negative number of murders, or 2.5 robberies. If you analyze such data with standard methods, you are likely to get erroneous estimates. Because Lott had ignored this, I thought that I had a valid reason not to trust his results.”

When Plassmann contacted Lott about his concerns, Lott turned his data over to Plassmann and encouraged him to re-examine the methodology and attempt to replicate the results.

“I did my own analysis,” Plassmann said. “To my surprise, it suggests that the right to carry concealed handguns does deter crime. Lott’s analysis has been criticized because his findings are not very stable, but our results are much more robust.

“To emphasize that a statistical analysis is valid only if the statistical model fits the data, we included a little play on words in the title of our article: Because crimes are ‘countable,’ you must examine them with a ‘count’ analysis, and not with standard methods,” he added.

Plassmann and Lott are now working together on related research. They are writing a paper that examines the relationship between gun ownership and crime.

The concept of viewing crime through an economic lens actually stems from the work of Gary Becker, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, Plassmann said.

“We can see crime as the outcome of supply and demand,” he noted. “If all potential victims are unarmed, crime is easy and, therefore, inexpensive. However, if potential victims are armed, crime becomes more difficult and expensive.”

From the “demand” perspective, when the cost of preventing crime becomes more expensive then the “demand” to commit it, the more likely society is to let another crime happen, Plassmann said.

As a researcher, Plassmann doesn’t advocate for or argue against carrying handguns, concealed or otherwise.

“I think all this analysis can do is suggest that the theory ‘More guns will cause more crime’ is probably not correct in this simple form,” he said.

Like this article? Please share!
1
Turning to child's play: Object recognition poses research puzzle
Scholar helps define "fundamentalism"

You Might Also Like

  • Binghamton-Lockheed team takes top prize in DoD contest

  • Cooperation is key to addressing climate change

  • NIH-funded work may lead to cancer treatments

  • Book traces disputes over teaching evolution

1 Comment

  • Reply Mike Corbett Apr 5, 2012 at 11:08 am

    This is about as logical as the Pastafarian relationship between the number of pirates and the rate of global warming: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster#Pirates_and_global_warming.
    Correlation does not imply causation. Who financed this study, the NRA? How about the level of crime in other countries where guns are not so easily available as in the Excited States? Why is there crime? Could the growing disparity between rich and poor, black and white, and many other factors possibly have anything to do with this?

    This does not pass the sniff test.

Leave a Reply to Mike Corbett Cancel Reply

 

Research in the news

  • Don’t crush that ant — it could plant a wildflower

  • What should replace disputed memorials?

  • What drives social behavior during the pandemic?

  • Ending the pandemic will require big pharma to put ethics before profits

  • Democrats are asking the wrong questions to protect charter school students

Recent Comments

  • Dave on Anechoic chamber puts sound to the test
  • Shelly King on Undergraduate’s study links stress, sugar consumption
  • Linda Dolly on Study may aid in early Alzheimer’s diagnosis
  • Mussie Gide on Ancient seawater may yield climate change insights
  • Christie on Watch Rex Parker solve a puzzle
Binghamton University Binghamton University

© 2021 Binghamton University State University of New York
Images used throughout this site are copyright protected. For permission and terms of use, visit the about us page